Minimalist Photography

I’ve joined a Facebook group of photographers who embrace minimalism in photography. Browsing through the posted images, there are quite a few that I really like. I have never considered myself one type of photographer or another, but in looking through many of the photographs I have made, I realize that some of my most minimalistic images are the ones that satisfy me most.

Windmill, Mendocino CA. Leica MP, 35 Summicron, TMax 100

Channeling Ansel

My wife and I visited the deYoung Museum in San Francisco recently to see an exhibit called Ansel Adams in Our Time. While I have seen his photographs in various places over the years; The Ansel Adams Gallery at Yosemite and some individual pieces in Carmel, I had never seen an entire exhibit of his work. Other than the crowds, it was an enjoyable afternoon and only intensified my appreciation for his work.

One of the photographs on display, Self Portrait, Monument Valley, Utah, ca. 1958 is a shadow self-portrait of Ansel with his view camera and tripod. Seeing the photograph that day reminded me that I have taken similar selfies over the years, mostly to amuse myself. With various 35mm film cameras in hand. mine are far less dramatic than his.

Three Photographs: The Fog at Tomales Point

For the 30 years I lived in the Arizona desert, I had forgotten all about fog. Here in the Bay Area, it’s a constant companion.

In February of 2016, I hiked the 9.4 mile out and back trail at Tomales Point along the Point Reyes National Seashore. The day started out sunny and nice but on the return, about two miles from the trailhead, just as I came across a herd of Tule Elk, the fog pushed down hard.

Tule Elk grazing near Tomales Bay. Leica M9, 35 Summicron

Living for 9 years in Bodega Bay, I had seen my share of fog, but on this day the fog was thick and heavy with moisture. I had to tuck my Leica M9 inside my jacket to keep it dry. At times, I could barely see the trail ahead of me. The lack of visibility and the sudden absence of other hikers made me feel unsettled.

The hike ends at Pierce Point Ranch, once the largest dairy ranch operation on the Point Reyes peninsula. Today, the ranch serves as housing for National Park Service employees.

Near the trailhead of Tomales Point trail. Leica M9, 35 Summicron

Pierce Point Ranch. Leica M9, 35 Summicron

It felt good to finally get back to the car, remove my wet jacket and pack away the Leica.

Play It Again Sam: The Sekonic L-208

Back in 2016, I wrote about a little light meter I bought to use with my Canon P rangefinder; the Sekonic L-208 Twin Mate. The Twin Mate looks 1950s or 1960s vintage, but it’s still being made today and retails for about $129. I’ve been using a meter-less Nikon F for the past few weeks and I’ve been taking the Twin Mate along with me to occasionally check my Sunny 16 skills. I had forgotten how useful this meter is and how it helps you really visualize f/stop and shutter speed combinations.

The L-208 is powered by a CR2032 3 volt battery, which has been in my meter for seven years and still going strong.

You can measure both reflective and incident light by sliding the little diffuser on the front of the meter. Set the ISO of your film on the face of the meter and press the little button. The red needle registers the amount of light. Turn the calculator dial until the green pointer and the red needle line up and read any number of aperture and shutter speed settings. Easy peasy. The numbers on the L-208 are clear and large enough for my old eyes. And every light meter reading is a little photography lesson.

The meter also comes with a hot shoe attachment, so you can mount it on your camera if you so desire. There’s also a lanyard so you can wear it around your neck. I just slip mine in my pocket.

The Sekonic L-208 Twin Mate is one of those products that just works and works well. And that’s why I’ve given it another shout out.

One Photograph: Father & Daughter

I was lucky to have lived on a thin sliver of land between the Pacific Coast Highway and miles of walkable beach for nine years. I am so grateful for that time. There was hardly ever an instance that I did not take a camera with me on those walks. One of my favorite things to do was sit down on a big piece of driftwood, watch people go by and take a photograph or two. It was beach “street photography.”

I wish I could say that Father’s Day is a happy day for me, but it is not. That’s all I will say about that. Still, this photograph I made with my Leica MP and 50mm Summicron on Kodak’s lovely T-Max 100 film reminds me to wish all you fathers out there a happy day this Sunday.

One Photograph: Airport Window with a Leica R4s

I listen to the 70s channel on SiriusXM radio more than any other. I identify with the music of that decade and those are the songs that stir the most memories and feelings for me. Sometimes, I hear a song that binds itself so tightly to a particular moment in my life that listening to it transports to that time and head space. Looking back through 14 years of my film photography, there are images that do that for me as well.

In November of 2019, I had returned home to Upstate New York to visit my parents. Returning to my hometown, the house I grew up in, even sleeping in the same bedroom I occupied as a kid always has an emotional impact on me. Even though I have not lived there since I was a teenager, it is where my roots are. I will be sad when my parents pass away, that house is sold and there is no longer a real reason to visit.

While I was there, something that I had hoped for in my life began to fall apart and near the end of my trip, I went through some very dark days. I had brought along my Leica R4s, 60mm f/2.8 Macro-Elmarit and a few rolls of Kodak T-max 400 and decided that a walk somewhere and some photography might settle me.

I borrowed my Dad’s pickup truck, grabbed the Leica and headed down to the small airport where, long ago, I had learned to fly airplanes. Tri-Cities Airport in Endicott, NY was built in the 1930s and served as the primary airport for the Endicott/Johnson City/Binghamton area until the 1950s. Many of the buildings including a big hangar and the administration/terminal building were built by the Works Progress Administration and had an art deco flavor. By the time I began learning to fly in the mid 1970s, commercial flights had long gone to the new Binghamton airport, but Tri-Cities had become a busy and vibrant general aviation airport with three flight schools and a charter service. I worked part-time at one of the flight schools, washing airplanes, answering phones and whatever else needed done. I was paid $1.50 per hour. When I earned $27, I redeemed my pay for one hour of flight instruction in a Piper Cherokee 140. I soloed on my 16th birthday, flying a plane by myself before I drove a car by myself.

As was the case with a lot of industrial areas of the Northeast, time was not kind to the area or to Tri-Cities Airport. The Endicott Johnson shoe factories closed and IBM, which had become the area’s largest employer, began moving operations and employees out of the area. Over the decades, the Village of Endicott struggled with much needed expensive repairs on the aging WPA buildings at the airport. One by one, the old relics had to be demolished. One of the few remaining original structures on the field, the old airport administration and terminal building, was abandoned many years ago. When I was learning to fly, this building was the social center for the airport with a big pot of coffee always brewing and young and old pilots sitting around the lobby doing lots of hangar flying.

It was a different scene the day I visited with my Leica. The nearly deserted airport, the empty terminal building with its broken windows and a biting November wind were perfect companions for the darkness I felt that day. A feeling that the best days, my best days, seemed at that moment in the past. I stopped to peer into the empty, lonely, nearly forgotten building then stepped back to capture my reflection in the glass.

Abandoned Terminal Building, Leica R4s, 60mm f/2.8 Macro-Elmarit, Kodak T-Max 400

I was in that horrible dark funk for the next three months and then, as has happened so many times in my life, my world righted itself and things began getting better. Actually better than I could have ever dreamed possible.

Here are some historical photos of my little hometown airport.

Robinson Airlines DC-3 at Tri-Cities Airport. Robinson Airlines became Mohawk Airlines which became Allegheny Airlines and eventually US Air.

Robinson Airlines staff and Village of Endicott representatives as Robinson launches DC-3 service from Tri-Cities Airport. (Photo Credit: Tom Reynolds)

A promotional image from Robinson Airlines. DC-3 at the gate at Tri-Cities Airport.

The main hangar, built by the WPA, This photo was taken in 2001. The hangar was deemed structurally unsound and was demolished some time later. (Photo Credit: Paul Rosales)

What’s left of the once proud administration and terminal building at Tri-Cities Airport (Image Credit: Google Maps)

One Photograph: The Superstition Mountains with a Nikon D70s

Although I have mostly been a film photographer, digital cameras have found their way into my life from time to time. My recent acquisition of a Fujifilm X-T1 got me thinking about all of the digital cameras I’ve owned. My first, was a Nikon D70s that I bought new in 2007. Ironically, that was the year I bought my first cell phone with a decent camera built in…the original iPhone, iPhone 2G, iPhone 1…it went by various names. I rarely used the camera in my first iPhone, but I did shoot a lot of pictures with my D70s. Here is an image from March of 2008, taken at the start of a day hike into the Superstition Mountains in Arizona. As I recall, my lens of choice at that time was the AF-Nikkor 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6D

Desert Fence, Superstition Mountains, Arizona

A Walk in Armstrong Woods

Every few years, I take a camera for a walk in Armstrong Woods, a grove of redwoods just outside of Guerneville, CA near the Russian River. I always try and capture the majesty of these giant trees, some over a thousand years old, but I never do the place justice. I don’t think a man and a camera can.

It’s dark and damp on the trails that wander around the bases of these trees. Light plays down in shafts, tickling the branches above and on the clover below. The light here fools even the hardiest of light meters, but I think the one in my Canon A-1 did a decent job on some nearly expired Kodak ColorPlus.

There are always a fair number of people in the preserve, but everyone speaks in hushed tones as if they were in church. The grove feels like a holy place.

I sent my Canon A-1 in for service about a year ago. Jim Holman at ICT did a nice CLA on it and got rid of the annoying Canon squeal that so many A-1 and AE-1 Canons have. I only shoot this camera a few times a year but always enjoy the experience.

Canon A-1 with 50mm Canon f/1.4 FD lens

Film Dog

I suppose the thought occurred to me first when, late last year, some of my favorite films were out of stock everywhere I looked. No Portra 400, no Pro Image 100, no Tri-X! And I thought about it again a few weeks ago when I visited one of my favorite camera shops and spent over a hundred bucks on a few rolls of film. As I got into my car and tossed the film into my camera bag, I did the math in my head. With processing and scanning, shooting my favorite C-41 film was going to cost me nearly $40 a roll all in. Photography as a hobby isn’t cheap and I have certainly blown wads of cash on expensive cameras and lenses, but as I see myself inching closer to retirement, I’m starting to become more frugal. The money I spent on this last batch of film kept poking at me. And not in a good way.

I am an old film dog but…I started considering digital photography. Again.

I’ve had my share of digital cameras and none of them have really given me the joy that shooting an old film camera does. I owned a Nikon D700 for a while and made some terrific pictures with it. But the Nikon DSLR was big and heavy and its controls and menus didn’t romance me, so I sold it.

Sonoma Coast, CA, Nikon D700 with Nikkor 50mm f/.14 AF-D

I also tried several Leica digital rangefinders, the M8, M9 and the Leica M-P (typ240). Those Leica lenses were spectacular, but I am not a rangefinder guy and I also always felt quite nervous carrying around that much money on my shoulder. Luckily, I sold every Leica I ever owned for a profit, so I recouped my investments after the Leica test drives.

Market Street, San Francisco, Leica M9 with 35 Summicron

So, was there a digital camera I could love?

I knew it needed to be small and light. I wanted a simple and easy-to-use photographer/camera interface with dials rather than multi-function buttons. Some digital cameras have menus that are science projects—I didn’t want to spend hours reading an owner’s manual. And because, based on my past history with digital, I wasn't sure how long this dance would last, I didn’t want to spend a fortune.

I considered the Nikon Df. I have many manual and auto-focus Nikkors and the Df reminds me a lot of my beloved Nikon FE camera. But I had taken a Df out on loan when the camera first came out and for no particular reason, the Df and I didn't gel. The new Nikon Z cameras sure looked nice, but the prices were all out of my budget. I also read quite a bit about the dizzying array of SONY mirrorless Alpha bodies. The earlier models were closer to my budget but I have read that the SONY menus can be confusing and that might discourage me.

My research eventually led me to Fujifilm’s X series of cameras, specifically the XT single digit DSLRs, aimed at pro photographers. The XTs are small, light, precise and made out of metal, reminding me of my favorite mechanical film cameras. The current model is the X-T5 and it retails for around $1700 which was more than I wanted to spend. The line started in 2014 with the X-T1 and you can find that camera on the used market from $300 to around $500. The more I read about the 16 megapixel X-T1, the more it appealed to me. Nine years is a long time in the digital world, but online reviews and You Tube videos convinced me that this camera is still a very competent performer and I could get into the Fujifilm X system with body and lens for well under a grand. As luck would have it, one of my trusted eBay sellers had a body for sale that belonged to his wife. It was well cared for and I picked it up for $350. I decided on Fuji’s kit lens, the XF 18-55mmF2.8-4 R LM OIS that I found used at Camera West in Walnut Creek, CA for $325.

My new-to-me Fujifilm X-T1 with 18-55 kit lens

Once in hand, I was immediately impressed with how well made the X-T1 is. Engraved metal, nice body covering material and a generous and comfortable grip. Even with the 18-55 zoom out front, the camera is light, easy to carry and well balanced but feels substantial. I wanted to find my way around this camera without reading the owner’s manual and to my surprise, everything is very intuitive to a long-time film photographer. I charged the battery, set the camera to automatic and took the ferry out to Alcatraz Island on a beautiful Bay Area Saturday afternoon.

Once I get to know this camera better, I will do a more detailed review. On my first day out, I kept it simple. I think the camera did a fine job of autoexposure under different kinds of lighting situations. And I got some satisfying images considering I had no idea what I was doing.

Of all of the digital cameras I have tried, the Fujifilm X-T1 seems the most natural in my hands…reminds me most of my favorite film cameras. I definitely bonded with this camera. I love the electronic view finder, fast autofocus and the Fuji film simulations. It was set on Provia this day. There are also all sorts of “recipes”available to create simulations for other film stocks including Kodachrome. The menu is easy to navigate. And transferring images from the camera to my Mac was easy peasy. I carried my X-T1 in a new Think Tank Photo Urban Access sling bag, one of the best carry bags I have ever used. I will review that soon as well.

Also nice is that for about the same price as one roll of color film and processing, I picked up an adapter that will allow me to use all of my vintage Nikon lenses on the X-T`1. Similarly priced adapters are available for my Pentax M42, Canon FD, Olympus OM and Minolta glass as well. It will be fun trying my various vintage lenses on the X-T1.

I am not by any means abandoning film photography. I love my film cameras and I love shooting film. I might limit film use to black and white, processing and scanning at home. We will see what happens to the price of film. For now, this old film dog is learning some new tricks.





Film $$$

This weekend I visited a town near the California coast where I used to live and the mom & pop photo store that was one of my favorite haunts. I needed film and decided I wanted to give them my business rather than ordering online. I was surprised to see a very good selection of film…Kodak, Fuji, Ilford and Cinestill. They had just received pro packs of Kodak Portra 400. Last time I checked the price of Portra 400 pro packs, they were $78. This weekend, at the local store, they were $120! Needless to say, I did not buy the Portra. However, what you see below was $107. Film photography is getting very expensive.